Is the 307 engine any good? - Impala Tech
Impala Tech


 
Official Sponsor of Team Impala     

Engine General Engine Discussion.

Impalas.net is the premier Chevrolet Impala Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-07-2009, 02:58 PM
drabina drabina is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern Hemisphere
Posts: 900
drabina is on a distinguished road
Default Is the 307 engine any good?

I found 68 Impala with 307 engine that's for sale. It is all original car with A/C. Nothing has been rebuild or changed (which is good and bad). I have browsed thru posts here but I do not see a lot of info about 307 block. Is it any good? I have no funds now to replace engine and having close to stock car is ok with me but if this particular engine is no good, I will probably just move on. Are spare parts easy to find just in case it needs a rebuild?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 01-07-2009, 07:48 PM
dgwar dgwar is offline
Senior Member
Don
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santee, SC
Posts: 960
dgwar is on a distinguished road
Default

nothing wrong with a 307, it just isn't a performance engine. It was built to save fuel, or so that is my opinion.
here is an article on it.
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...nce/index.html
__________________
1961 Impala Sport Sedan
http://carnutguys.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2009, 07:48 PM
Big Dave Big Dave is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,624
Big Dave is on a distinguished road
Default

If the motor runs it is. A 307 is a 283 bore with a 327 crank. Because this is a 1968 block it uses the large journal so if you replace the block with a 350 4.00 inch bore block you can build a 327 instead of a 307 which is better than a 307 because it breathes better with a bigger bore. The 307 crank in a 400 cubic inch small block (you would need to sleeve the bearings) would give you a 350 cubic inch motor the way the general should have built it. 4.125" bore, 3.25" stroke. Makes for a zippy motor. None of these can be rebuilt as cheaply as buying a crate motor, but they are fun to think about.

Big Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2009, 07:54 PM
62BillT 62BillT is offline
Senior Member
Bill
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moneta, VA
Posts: 309
62BillT is on a distinguished road
Default

The 307 is actually my least favorite old type engine, BUT they are still good engines. The same engine builder friend of mine that I mentioned in the other post, convinced me (again) that they are good. After mentioning that they weren't my favorite, he then pointed out that they are the exact same engine as the 327 except they have a little smaller bore. Well he was right again. I bought my '72 C-10 Pick-up with a 307, 3-Speed when it had 95,000 original miles. That was just about 9 years ago and it now has 152,000. Still runs great.

The only thing I would say about it tho, is don't abused it and maintain it regularly. Changing the oil and filter often is very important.

Parts are no problem to find for any Small Block Chevy.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2009, 08:58 AM
drabina drabina is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern Hemisphere
Posts: 900
drabina is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for all the replies. If I get the 68 Impala, I am not going to turn it into a performance car. My goal is to have nice daily cruiser with sort of good mileage. So my concern is mostly if the 307 engine is capable of moving the 3700lbs car. And by that I do not mean spinning tires but decent acceleration would be nice :-)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:09 AM
Big Dave Big Dave is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,624
Big Dave is on a distinguished road
Default

Now we are talking about two mutually exclusive things, unless you are going to install a new LS-3 Cadillac engine with displacement on demand technology in your Impala. It takes it from a fire breathing 6.2 liter motor down to a 3.1L four cylinder by turning on or off cylinders on the fly. The motor only uses as much engine as it needs to meet the requirements of your right foot. That coupled with an overdrive six speed transmission and you have the best of both worlds performance and economy.

Big Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:20 AM
drabina drabina is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern Hemisphere
Posts: 900
drabina is on a distinguished road
Default

Yeah, but I would need to keep the car stock (307) due to lack of funds for engine transplant. By "decent acceleration" I did not mean fast but just decent. I can't express it more clearly. I currently drive 6 cyl. Buick with 3800 engine and 205 hp under the hood and this car, even for being in "grandma's car" category is fast with good pickup. On the other hand, I used to have 93 Pontiac Sunbird with 2.0L engine (something around 115hp) and this car was slow as molasses even with its 4 speed manual transmission.

So if 307 after rebuild can get me around 16-18mpg with decent acceleration I am all set. I just do not know if it is possible with this engine.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:29 AM
Big Dave Big Dave is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,624
Big Dave is on a distinguished road
Default

Me either. I would not rebuild it unless it needed a rebuild as you can buy a brand new 350 cube crate motor for the price of the rebuild.

Big Dave
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:52 AM
62BillT 62BillT is offline
Senior Member
Bill
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moneta, VA
Posts: 309
62BillT is on a distinguished road
Default

If you do keep the 307, which of course will keep the car all original, the engine should bring you enough accelleration to be happy and should bring the mileage that you have listed, especially if you keep it "super-tuned" and drive it sensibly. The 307 in my truck can pull a good load and I am all around satisfied with it.

As a side note, the 307 can sometimes get confused with the newer 305. I don't think too many will dis-agree when I say the 307 is a much better engine.

By the way, if you buy this car, bring it out on the Hi-way for a test drive first.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2009, 01:35 PM
Big Dave Big Dave is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,624
Big Dave is on a distinguished road
Default

The only motor worse than the 305 is the 262 cid V-8 they built for one year and stuck in an Impala. The bores in that motor are the size of a quarter, which isn't a problem if we are talking a V-16 motor, but in a V-8 it is the pits. Like I said the 307 is just a stroked 283 which was one of Chevy's better motors. Not too strong on torque, but it would rev to the moon so it was quick with the right gears.

Big Dave
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-22-2009, 09:48 AM
bobss396 bobss396 is offline
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14
bobss396 is on a distinguished road
Default

The 307 with a 2 barrel carb is a good set up. Easy on gas, enough pep to get you around. It is a vast improvement on the 283 regarding the PCV system it offers. I always liked them left alone bone stock, very reliable and smooth running as well.

Bob
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
any good places to buy an engine? 64ss Engine 6 11-26-2008 05:20 PM
engine and vin numbers happycamperclassics General Tech 1 09-13-2008 06:46 AM
Engine knock on newly rebuilt 396 1968 Caprice 396 General Tech 11 07-08-2008 04:59 PM
Engine Weights...Good Info Eubanks' 64 Engine 0 06-05-2008 02:23 PM
Engine getting rebuilt.. Simple misktake bex66 General Tech 6 06-02-2008 07:33 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.



2009 AutoForums